Regards,
Stijn

--047d7bfd0776320a750501467940
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Bug Ficks <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:***@live.com" target="_blank">***@live.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Hello,<br>
<br>
about 4 weeks ago I&#39;ve emailed Samsung about a license violation in one<br>
of their core libraries used in their SmartTVs. They&#39;ve copied and<br>
renamed some parts from FFmpeg.<br>
Yesterday they finally released &quot;source&quot; which was exactly one .c and<br>
one .h file with code copied from FFmpeg plus a bunch of precompiled files.<br>
Since FFmpeg can be used with either GPL or LGPL my question is, can<br>
Samsung decide to use LGPL after they&#39;ve already been caught in a<br>
license violation?<br>
<br>
Kind Regards,<br>
 -bugficks<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br>Hi bugficks,<br><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">