Discussion:
unknown
1970-01-01 00:00:00 UTC
Permalink
--001a11c35300719d0e04dd2d43df
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir="ltr">On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Thomas Charron <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:***@gmail.com" target="_blank">***@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 3:58 PM, SonWon &lt;<a href="mailto:***@gmail.com">***@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>

&gt; If it &quot;is a violation of both the spirit and the letter of the GPL&quot;, then we<br>
&gt; should discuss what drove him to that position.  I think we would find that<br>
&gt; open and free software has a dark side that nobody wants to address.  People<br>
&gt; claiming others work as their own.  Our community needs to clean our own<br>
&gt; house first before we can ask others to openly and freely share the code<br>
&gt; they develop.  If we let developers to continue to claim credit for code<br>
&gt; they didn&#39;t develop then our community will continue to be diseased.<br>
<br>
</div>  Then he would have legal basis to sue the pants off them.  Instead,<br>
he decided to do something just as bad.  So he&#39;s doing to other people<br>
exactly what was done to him.  Did it happen?  I don&#39;t know, but it<br>
probably did.  That does not give him the right to turn around and<br>
steal the entire kernel from the thousands of people who authored it.<br>
<br>
--<br>
-- Thomas<br>
</blockquote></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div>

Loading...